Author: Joseph Ciarrochi
Date: 02:53:36 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
yes, i'll post once tourni is finished (late tomorrow). yes, it is 40 4 for the whole game... maybe longer time controls will show more of an advantage for fritz and fruit (i'll need basement full of computers for longer tests) On December 28, 2005 at 05:12:18, Sune Larsson wrote: >On December 28, 2005 at 03:38:10, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>I have been evaluating rybka's endgame play using sune larson's endgame >>testsuite. So far, Rybka does not seem to be significantly worse than fruit >>2.2.1 or fritz 9 >> >>time control 40 minutes 4 sec increment >> >>Rybka versus fritz 9 (played on Pentium 3) >>Rybka versus fruit 2.2.1 (Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz with 1,023 MB Memory) >> >> >>Record on the 9 nunn endgame positions (engines playing both sides) >> win loss draw >>Rybka versus fruit 2.2.1 3 5 10 >>Rybka versus fritz9 4 5 9 >> >>So rybka's endgame is not up to the rest of its playing level, but i would not >>classify it as weak, as many have suggested. True, it is not the best. >> >> if i was in paderborn, and playing against rybka, i would certainly play an >>opening that is likely to lead to an early endgame. >> >>best >>Joseph > > > Hi Joseph, > > could you post these games please? Was this 40 min+4 sec for the whole game? > > regards > sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.