Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 09:48:11 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 09:20:44, Jan Kiwitter wrote: >On December 28, 2005 at 07:33:18, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On December 28, 2005 at 03:12:23, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >> >>>Interesting game. I didn't like .. h6 and .. g5 by Rybka in the opening (as I >>>suspect most human players won't), and there were a few moments in the endgame >>>where better resistance could have been put up - but these are relatively minor >>>points. >>> >>>The biggest issue was the incorrect sacrifice of the h6 pawn. The Rybka static >>>eval incorrectly gives the following position (and others of a similar type) as >>>roughly equal: >>> >>>[D] 8/1b2b1k1/pp1ppp2/nPq5/P1P1P3/2QRNPP1/8/1N2KB1r b - - 0 27 >> >>The position _is_ roughly equal. >>It was just badly misplayed by Rybka. > >I also thought like this during the game. I think instead of exchanging the >queens soon Rybka may have tried to activate his pair of bishops by planning >f6-f5 sooner or later. (Of course this was just my impression without any deep >analysis.) > >Greetings >Jan Mike / Jan, can you win or even draw against an engine like Shredder here? Computer assisted is ok. This looks like a classic case of a position which can´t be improved .. Vas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.