Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 10:58:28 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 03:16:39, enrico carrisco wrote: >http://www.computerschach.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=208&Itemid=167 > >-elc. " To obtain relatively demanding games, I chose the time control with 10 minutes per game and 10 seconds per move." I must admit that time control worries me when the tester also states: "I wanted to create a series of tests which make it possible to eliminate the weak points mentioned above and to make a really comparable Rating List. Furthermore it was my aim that this Rating List with relatively little effort can be updated at the inclusion of a new engine. To avoid problems at the automatic engine tournaments, engines, which work without problems on the Chessbase-GUI, are exclusively tested" Sounds to me like this list will give you a good estimate, but if you want more accuracy and more thurough rating list, then either the CEGT or the SSDF.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.