Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 11:16:50 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 13:28:34, Oreopoulos Kostas wrote: > > >>>Oreopoulos (Zuschauer): correct play cannot be proven :) >> >>there are endgames analysis which show correct play...it can be proven >> > > >I was not talking about some endgame analysis. >I was talking about the specific endgame, and calling that dead lost. I did not called dead lost...it was someone else... I said that it was lost for white unless black would have made several mistakes...which happen > >Its very simple. The position was never dead lost. >Lost maybe, but there is a great distance between those. > >I do believe the serious mistake was letting white play Rd6 after he already had >played Be5. with 39...Qe3 the endgame would have been different It created a profound pepreptual check pattern that even if was not >successfull , it should not have been allowed. I agree with this, but estimating a position has nothing to do with the final result. The final result show that Shredder was not able to win and Rybka took the opportunity of the mistakes of Shredder to draw. Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.