Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:02:16 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 10:54:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 28, 2005 at 10:16:53, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On December 27, 2005 at 04:15:55, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Did you use the default personality or slightly positional personality that I >>>believe to be better based on the following lists. >>> >>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitz.html >>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ratingall.html >>> >>>Note that in the second list slightly positional lost rating from beating Movei >>>3.5-1.5 but inspite of it slightly positional has the biggest rating in the 32 >>>bit section(64 bit slightly positional was not tested there) >>> >>>Uri >> >>I don't understand how you came to this conclusion from the data you linked to >>?! >>Which result suggests that slightly positional is better than very positional? >> >>Peter > >Note that SP is slightly positional and default is very positional so nothing is >written for the default. > >From the first link > >1 Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit SP 2924 38 37 376 78.6 % 2698 15.7 % >3 Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit 2875 24 24 778 75.6 % 2678 21.9 % > > >From the second link > >2 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit SP 2821 73 72 64 62.5 % 2733 31.2 % >4 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit 2815 14 14 1816 71.0 % 2660 29.7 % > > >Uri Thanks for explanation, I didn't read carefully enough. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.