Author: Jan Kiwitter
Date: 14:21:13 12/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 12:48:11, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On December 28, 2005 at 09:20:44, Jan Kiwitter wrote: > >>On December 28, 2005 at 07:33:18, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On December 28, 2005 at 03:12:23, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >>> >>>>Interesting game. I didn't like .. h6 and .. g5 by Rybka in the opening (as I >>>>suspect most human players won't), and there were a few moments in the endgame >>>>where better resistance could have been put up - but these are relatively minor >>>>points. >>>> >>>>The biggest issue was the incorrect sacrifice of the h6 pawn. The Rybka static >>>>eval incorrectly gives the following position (and others of a similar type) as >>>>roughly equal: >>>> >>>>[D] 8/1b2b1k1/pp1ppp2/nPq5/P1P1P3/2QRNPP1/8/1N2KB1r b - - 0 27 >>> >>>The position _is_ roughly equal. >>>It was just badly misplayed by Rybka. >> >>I also thought like this during the game. I think instead of exchanging the >>queens soon Rybka may have tried to activate his pair of bishops by planning >>f6-f5 sooner or later. (Of course this was just my impression without any deep >>analysis.) >> >>Greetings >>Jan > >Mike / Jan, > >can you win or even draw against an engine like Shredder here? Computer assisted >is ok. This looks like a classic case of a position which canĀ“t be improved .. > >Vas Hi Vas, indeed my first tries to win as black didn't work. Maybe I played too bad or you are just right and I overestimated the possibilities of black. Best regards Jan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.