Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 01:43:17 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2005 at 18:09:45, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >Roger asked about the programs that seem to differ in blitz and standard time >controls. I am using that ever reliable CEGT source.....The programs with the >biggest discrepencies are: > >(note, negative numbers mean better at blitz. first number is 40/40 repeated >rating. second number is blitz rating 40 with 4 sec increment.) > >2 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit SP 2821 2924 -103 >144 Pepito v1.59 2490 2559 -69 >3 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit VT 2820 2881 -61 >123 Crafty Cito 1.2-1.4.1 2526 2577 -51 >39 Hiarcs 9 2674 2721 -47 >132 Yace 0.99.87 2508 2549 -41 >91 Delfi 4.6 2594 2633 -39 >126 Zarkov 4.75 2518 2557 -39 >127 Ufim 7.00 2518 2553 -35 >41 Loop List 600 noEGTB 2673 2706 -33 >100 Little Goliath Evolution 2572 2603 -31 >45 Spike 1.0a Mainz 2670 2696 -26 >141 Chiron 0.4.1b 2494 2520 -26 >21 Fritz 8 Bilbao 2714 2739 -25 >146 Amyan 1.597 2488 2512 -24 >1 Rybka 1.0 Beta-64bit 2852 2875 -23 >4 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit 2815 2837 -22 >150 Kiwi 0.6d 2474 2496 -22 >83 Slow Chess Blitz WV 2600 2621 -21 >81 Zappa 1.1 2601 2590 11 >20 Fruit 2.1 2716 2703 13 >113 Green Light Chess 3.01.2.2 2550 2535 15 >152 Kiwi 0.6b 2467 2451 16 >50 Gandalf 6.0 2661 2640 21 If you take the error margins of both lists into account, is there *any* program left (out of a few hundred) that has a significant difference in performances? -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.