Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 02:03:11 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 04:58:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 03:30:49, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On December 28, 2005 at 21:13:25, Gustavo Bedoya wrote: >> >>>Hi all >>>I'm rather new here , and I know that Rybka is the >>>outstanding engine nowadays. >>>But Surprisingly I've read it lost a game with an (excuse me if I'm >>>wrong)inferior engine. I read that Rybka is not playing with full strngth >>>because if so, it would be so easy for Rybka. >>>I ask all the experts in this Topics if Rybka is really the strongest engine of >>>all time, an how can be so stronger than others, what is different in its source >>>code that makes it so lethal,( in my modest engine matches games, Rybka crushes >>>every engine one after one, excepting Fritz9 in the ChessBase interface +5=2-5). >>>And in the future it can be cloned and there will be stronger engines every >>>year, even every mounth? >>>I'll be happy with all your opinions >>>Best Regards >> >>1. To be out of range for an occasionally loss against other programs, >>you must be >= ~750 rating points better. This means even strong Rybka >>can lose occasionally against around 100 different programs and Spike >>is surely one of the best in that field. >> >>2. No source is published, thus how should it be 'cloned'? >> >>Guenther > >It can be cloned if the computer of the programmer is defected by some trojan >horse so somebody can steal the source. > >Another way without trojan horse is simply stilling the computer that rybka is >developed in it. > >Uri Stilling a computer is one thing but kidnapping the author is better.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.