Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 02:14:18 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 05:08:24, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 05:03:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On December 29, 2005 at 04:58:28, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 29, 2005 at 03:30:49, Günther Simon wrote: >>> >>>>On December 28, 2005 at 21:13:25, Gustavo Bedoya wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi all >>>>>I'm rather new here , and I know that Rybka is the >>>>>outstanding engine nowadays. >>>>>But Surprisingly I've read it lost a game with an (excuse me if I'm >>>>>wrong)inferior engine. I read that Rybka is not playing with full strngth >>>>>because if so, it would be so easy for Rybka. >>>>>I ask all the experts in this Topics if Rybka is really the strongest engine of >>>>>all time, an how can be so stronger than others, what is different in its source >>>>>code that makes it so lethal,( in my modest engine matches games, Rybka crushes >>>>>every engine one after one, excepting Fritz9 in the ChessBase interface +5=2-5). >>>>>And in the future it can be cloned and there will be stronger engines every >>>>>year, even every mounth? >>>>>I'll be happy with all your opinions >>>>>Best Regards >>>> >>>>1. To be out of range for an occasionally loss against other programs, >>>>you must be >= ~750 rating points better. This means even strong Rybka >>>>can lose occasionally against around 100 different programs and Spike >>>>is surely one of the best in that field. >>>> >>>>2. No source is published, thus how should it be 'cloned'? >>>> >>>>Guenther >>> >>>It can be cloned if the computer of the programmer is defected by some trojan >>>horse so somebody can steal the source. >>> >>>Another way without trojan horse is simply stilling the computer that rybka is >>>developed in it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Stilling a computer is one thing but kidnapping the author is better. > >I meant stealing a computer. >For some reason I made stupid spelling mistake. > >Note that I do not suggest nothing of these options but only replied to the >question "how should it be 'cloned'". > >kidnapping the author is also possibility but of course I hope nothing of it is >going to happen. > >Uri I am not interested in the author himself but only his brain. So Lectering his brain would do it. Of course this cant happen because it would need a WW between Europe & Israel vs USA. Rather impossible. [Please dont call your typos stupid. A typo is the soul of communication. Dr. Rolf F.]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.