Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:58:50 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 05:56:33, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 05:02:36, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On December 29, 2005 at 04:49:09, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On December 28, 2005 at 16:04:28, Tord Romstad wrote: >>> >>>>Perhaps you can even omit some >>>>piece types. I don't evaluate pawn or king mobility at all (in my >>>>experience, there are better ways to evaluate king activity), and I >>>>have never seen any measurable difference in strength when I >>>>switch queen mobility on or off. >>> >>>What about knights? >> >>Good question. I have never tried disabling knight mobility, but >>it is perfectly possible that a piece square table with high values >>for central squares would work just as well as pseudo-legal >>mobility for knights. >> >>Tord > >My mobility for the knight is legal mobility. >Knight that is pinned get no bonus. > >Uri When I think more about it I will need to give it negative score when I change my mobility evaluation because today I give every side bonus based on the number of all moves and I plan to change it to bonus based on the number of all moves relative to material(similiar to fruit) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.