Author: Günther Simon
Date: 03:06:15 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 04:58:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 03:30:49, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On December 28, 2005 at 21:13:25, Gustavo Bedoya wrote: >> >>>Hi all >>>I'm rather new here , and I know that Rybka is the >>>outstanding engine nowadays. >>>But Surprisingly I've read it lost a game with an (excuse me if I'm >>>wrong)inferior engine. I read that Rybka is not playing with full strngth >>>because if so, it would be so easy for Rybka. >>>I ask all the experts in this Topics if Rybka is really the strongest engine of >>>all time, an how can be so stronger than others, what is different in its source >>>code that makes it so lethal,( in my modest engine matches games, Rybka crushes >>>every engine one after one, excepting Fritz9 in the ChessBase interface +5=2-5). >>>And in the future it can be cloned and there will be stronger engines every >>>year, even every mounth? >>>I'll be happy with all your opinions >>>Best Regards >> >>1. To be out of range for an occasionally loss against other programs, >>you must be >= ~750 rating points better. This means even strong Rybka >>can lose occasionally against around 100 different programs and Spike >>is surely one of the best in that field. >> >>2. No source is published, thus how should it be 'cloned'? >> >>Guenther > >It can be cloned if the computer of the programmer is defected by some trojan >horse so somebody can steal the source. > >Another way without trojan horse is simply stilling the computer that rybka is >developed in it. > >Uri I guess the chance that someone infects your computer with a trojan and steals Moveis source is much higher, than trying the same on Vas' development machine. Why not apply more common sense instead of inflating bandwidth with 'least probability' games, except for funny irony reasons? After hundreds of similar posts they are just not that funny anymore ;) It is not necessary to add all (low probability) circumstances to a Human sentence, as people agreed to use language in a more efficient way. Thus please don't add 'answers' and 'conditions' you can safely assume they know already or are simply far from significance. Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.