Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Zappa vs. Shredder Update, drawish game (PGN)

Author: Sandro Necchi

Date: 05:46:02 12/29/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 29, 2005 at 08:11:29, Franco wrote:

>On December 29, 2005 at 07:23:05, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>>I fully agree on this and when I saw it I saw the full point going to Zappa
>>"unfortunately", but we just started working on the engine as our main goal is
>>to win in Torino! (I hope to see you there as I am planning to make a short
>>visit).
>>>Ciao
>>Sandro
>
>Well, I know that in Turin it will be a very speciale contest, but I'm no more
>so interested in computer chess (Today is snowing and so I'm not at work...).

I see..it was snowing in Lucca too...now we have the sun...

>
>Reading along the mex enclosed in this computer chat, I'm asking myself: what
>about the '90 pioneers, Lang, Dan Beil, Ed, Marty, and so on ?

Richard Lang does not work full time anymore on computer chess programs and he
makes just changes on his program to make it suitable for palm etc...
I believe he did not want to rewrite entirely his program to stay on the
top...so he left the field.

Ed retired and he still working on chess program as a hobby.

Marty is still working on chess programs but not to commercialize a chess
engine. He made a special program to let people play online, but than the
company closed as they were loosinig too much money...now is working on a big
project to create a teaching software to teach chess in the schools...he may
will comeback to chess programs one day...

Dan Beil I do not know...

>Are all of them out of computer chess work ?
>
>In terms more general, I'm interested to know: they disapperead because
>
>1) there are a few of economic gratification with strongly and increasingly work
>or because the leadership in computer chess programmation is too difficult ?

No, one must be good in chess programming and in sales too to get enough money.
Programmers like Marty are genius and can improve their programs if they want...

>2) When the new generation is surpassing you with new concepts (nihil move, lazy
>evalutazion, and so on.) , there is no hope to recover rewritng all the code?

It depends...maybe just part of it...

>
>Could be this last an intereresting question to take a new message in this chat?

Well, I guess I have partially answered...

>
>Bye bye
>Franco
>kanizsa@libero.it

Ciao
Sandro



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.