Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 07:01:45 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 09:39:50, Gustavo Bedoya wrote: >Hi all, > >As I said I'm new here, so if I'm misunderstanding something please let me now >I do not want to bewith anybody. > >Reading the message about Kramnik is the best champion, >if I'm right is because he doesn't fight for money anylonger ? not for his chess >achievements? >I have a very personal opinion of Kramnik's actitude about chess but I don't >like to disscus it because it is very "personal" and kind of agressive. > >Best regards for all My point was indeed that Kramnik is a peaceful individual who enjoys chess and its ambience - while Fischer or Kasparov sought success and nothing but personal success. I promise you that Kramnik would still beat all of them if there were a real match. Kramnik plays a much better chess than Topalov to be right on the point. Topalov is good but I'm sure he doesnt belong to the class of Fischer, Karpov, Kasparov or Kramnik.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.