Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 08:12:01 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 10:44:37, Ignacio Santos Crespo wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 10:30:20, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >> >>>You are wrong. >>>Ignacio. >> >>Thanks!! >> >>I have post a misstake PC tastatur move, and I am wrong now? >> >>Next games post YOU!! >> >>Pfui! > >Hi Eduard, > >After 44. b3+ Kc3 Rybka wants to play 45. Kh4 and on my AMD64 3200+ needs 141 >seconds to see 45... a5 with draw. > >Rybka - Gandalf >8/8/p7/5N1p/P3p3/1Pk3K1/2P5/8 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Rybka 1.0 Preview 32-bit: > > +- (3.98) Profundidad: 11 00:00:01 597kN >45.Rf2 Rb4 46.c4 a5 47.Rg3 h4+ 48.Rg2 Rc5 49.Cxh4 Rd4 > +- (3.98) Profundidad: 12 00:00:02 1013kN >45.Rf2 Rb4 46.c4 a5 47.Rg3 h4+ 48.Rxh4 Rc5 49.Rg4 Rb4 50.Ce3 > +- (3.98) Profundidad: 13 00:00:04 2124kN >45.Rh4 Rb4 46.c4 a5 47.Rxh5 Rc5 48.Rg4 Rb4 49.Ce3 Rc5 50.Cc2 > +- (4.89) Profundidad: 13 00:00:06 3141kN >45.Rh4 Rb4 46.c4 a5 47.Rxh5 Rc5 48.Rg4 Rb4 49.Ce3 Rc5 50.Cc2 e3 51.Rf4 > +- (4.95) Profundidad: 14 00:00:06 3511kN >45.Rh4 Rb4 46.c4 Rc5 47.Rxh5 Rb4 48.Rg4 Rc5 49.Rf4 Rb4 50.Re3 a5 > +- (4.89) Profundidad: 15 00:00:10 5710kN >45.Rh4 Rb4 46.c4 Rc5 47.Rxh5 Rb4 48.Rg4 Rc5 49.Rf4 Rb4 50.Re3 Rc5 51.Rxe4 Rb4 > +- (4.95) Profundidad: 16 00:00:20 11029kN >45.Rh4 Rb4 46.c4 Rc5 47.Rxh5 Rb4 48.Rg4 Rc5 49.Rf4 Rb4 50.Rxe4 Rc5 51.Re3 Rb4 > +- (4.95) Profundidad: 17 00:00:34 17796kN >45.Rh4 Rb4 46.c4 Rc5 47.Rxh5 Rb4 48.Rg4 Rc5 49.Rf4 Rb4 50.Rxe4 Rc5 51.Re3 a5 > +- (4.95) Profundidad: 18 00:00:56 31119kN >45.Rh4 a5 46.Ce3 Rd2 47.Cc4+ Rxc2 48.b4 Rc3 49.bxa5 Rxc4 50.a6 e3 51.Rxh5 e2 > ² (0.43) Profundidad: 19 00:02:21 80396kN >45.Rf2 Rb4 46.c4 a5 47.Rg3 Rc5 48.Rf4 e3 49.Cxe3 Rb4 50.Cc2+ Rc5 51.Rg5 Rb6 > +- (4.95) Profundidad: 19 00:03:10 109033kN >45.Rf2 Rb4 46.c4 Rc5 47.Rg3 Rb4 48.Rh4 Rc5 49.Rxh5 Rb4 50.Rg4 Rc5 51.Rf4 Rb4 > +- (4.95) Profundidad: 20 00:05:57 203743kN >45.Rf4 Rb4 46.Rxe4 Rc5 47.b4+ Rc6 48.a5 h4 49.Cxh4 Rb7 50.Rf3 Rc7 51.c4 Rc6 > +- (5.85) Profundidad: 20 00:07:47 258230kN > >Best, >Ignacio. You can not know how many time Rybka hase in such a game with timecontrol 110', or? All is possible! That was my intension. Clear was the ending won. With EGTB very easy , that is not the point. My Point was a) Rybka have no EGTB b) Rybka have little time Eduard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.