Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Reason is simple: That is not fair - Point ! (nt)

Author: Stuart Cracraft

Date: 10:27:37 12/29/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 29, 2005 at 05:56:23, Eduard Nemeth wrote:

>On December 29, 2005 at 04:12:29, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>>I haven't had the time to follow all threads about Paderborn - so I just might
>>have missed something here - but could you explain a bit more what was unfair
>>with this game?
>>
>>regards
>>sune
>
>Hello Sune,
>
>The notation of this game (Zappa vs. Rybka) was on the official Site. On
>playchess but only 13 moves. In Chat on Playchess I Said german "Ihr Penner".
>
>I said this then on the official Site was more moves to seen than on playchess.
>
>After my comment, 5 Minutes later, all moves was deleted on the official Site.
>
>(Zappa was lost I seems)
>
>Regards,
>Eduard.

Yes - and this is the point. When the newcomer defeats the big-boys,
we get a "lack of information".

Doesn't that bother people somewhat?

It feels like censorship to me and bothers me
even though it could be a simple error due to
astonishment (about Rybka) of the person putting it in.

Stuart




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.