Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 11:16:58 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 10:54:29, Günther Simon wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 09:52:18, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On December 29, 2005 at 06:06:15, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>On December 29, 2005 at 04:58:28, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On December 29, 2005 at 03:30:49, Günther Simon wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 28, 2005 at 21:13:25, Gustavo Bedoya wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hi all >>>>>>I'm rather new here , and I know that Rybka is the >>>>>>outstanding engine nowadays. >>>>>>But Surprisingly I've read it lost a game with an (excuse me if I'm >>>>>>wrong)inferior engine. I read that Rybka is not playing with full strngth >>>>>>because if so, it would be so easy for Rybka. >>>>>>I ask all the experts in this Topics if Rybka is really the strongest engine of >>>>>>all time, an how can be so stronger than others, what is different in its source >>>>>>code that makes it so lethal,( in my modest engine matches games, Rybka crushes >>>>>>every engine one after one, excepting Fritz9 in the ChessBase interface +5=2-5). >>>>>>And in the future it can be cloned and there will be stronger engines every >>>>>>year, even every mounth? >>>>>>I'll be happy with all your opinions >>>>>>Best Regards >>>>> >>>>>1. To be out of range for an occasionally loss against other programs, >>>>>you must be >= ~750 rating points better. This means even strong Rybka >>>>>can lose occasionally against around 100 different programs and Spike >>>>>is surely one of the best in that field. >>>>> >>>>>2. No source is published, thus how should it be 'cloned'? >>>>> >>>>>Guenther >>>> >>>>It can be cloned if the computer of the programmer is defected by some trojan >>>>horse so somebody can steal the source. >>>> >>>>Another way without trojan horse is simply stilling the computer that rybka is >>>>developed in it. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>I guess the chance that someone infects your computer with a trojan >>>and steals Moveis source is much higher, >>>than trying the same on Vas' development machine. >>> >>>Why not apply more common sense instead of inflating bandwidth >>>with 'least probability' games, except for funny irony reasons? >>> >>>After hundreds of similar posts they are just not that funny >>>anymore ;) It is not necessary to add all (low probability) >>>circumstances to a Human sentence, as people agreed to use >>>language in a more efficient way. Thus please don't add 'answers' >>>and 'conditions' you can safely assume they know already or are >>>simply far from significance. >>> >>>Guenther >> >>Please would you let others write what they want to write just like you write >>what you want to write. It's a gross impoliteness to tell others - mostly adults >>- what they should write! How you interprete messages this is alone your >>business of course. > >Looking for justifications for your future troll messages? ;-) No, for next time complaining if you are stalking. >Nevertheless you are wrong in this special case. > >Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.