Author: Tim Mirabile
Date: 08:39:50 03/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 30, 1999 at 10:15:20, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>On March 29, 1999 at 11:22:52, Tim Mirabile wrote:
>
>>On March 29, 1999 at 10:30:26, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>>
>>>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers
>>>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo
>>>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ----
>>>> 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363
>>>> 1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457
>>
>>Just curious - why was CM6000 given "top billing" over Fritz, when its rating is
>>equal, it's played fewer games, and vs weaker opposition?
>
>Please, weaker opposition has nothing to with it, look at the won percentage.
>It has to do with decimals.
Not what I meant - consider the different psychological impact if the list read:
THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers
Rating + - Games Won Oppo
------ --- --- ----- --- ----
1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457
1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.