Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 21:02:59 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 22:13:47, Chessfun wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 22:01:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On December 29, 2005 at 11:33:50, Ted Summers wrote: >> >>>Well in that case I will give the odds to Rybka. Even if you never know, that >>>upset factor can be a pain in the butt. >> >>I apologize, >> Gandalf is 0.5 points ahead on Rybka and it has WHITE against Fruit, an >> advantage for GANDALF. >> Rybka has BLACK, which in chess is a huge disadvantage. >> >>The statistical odds for gandalf to be at least a divided tournament winner or >>undivided tournament winner is far bigger than the statistical odds Rybka wins >>undivided the tournament. >> >>So you should redo your math a bit. >> >>Vincent > >I think maybe you should re-check your figures and redo your math. > >Rybka is in 1st 1/2 a point ahead. >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?475027 > >http://wwwcs.uni-paderborn.de/~IPCCC/ has the wrong table I believe a round >behind. > >Sarah. It seems i made mistake, apologies! One should never trust university guys. Don't get paid to get jobs done.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.