Author: John Merlino
Date: 10:04:07 03/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 30, 1999 at 11:39:50, Tim Mirabile wrote: >On March 30, 1999 at 10:15:20, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>On March 29, 1999 at 11:22:52, Tim Mirabile wrote: >> >>>On March 29, 1999 at 10:30:26, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>> >>>>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers >>>>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>>>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>>>> 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363 >>>>> 1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457 >>> >>>Just curious - why was CM6000 given "top billing" over Fritz, when its rating is >>>equal, it's played fewer games, and vs weaker opposition? >> >>Please, weaker opposition has nothing to with it, look at the won percentage. >>It has to do with decimals. > >Not what I meant - consider the different psychological impact if the list read: > > THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers > Rating + - Games Won Oppo > ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- > 1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457 > 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363 Two possible tie-breakers: 1. Alphabetical 2. Winning percentage jm
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.