Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 06:33:10 12/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2005 at 09:16:53, Mathieu Pagé wrote: >On December 30, 2005 at 07:01:49, Ryan B. wrote: > >>On December 30, 2005 at 06:56:17, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On December 30, 2005 at 06:53:25, Ted Summers wrote: >>> >>>>I can't hold it any more, "YES, YES, YES!!!". I am sure Rybka will win Paderborn >>>>2005! way to go Vasik Rajlich! Your program is a great piece of work. >>> >>>well, it did play the best chess and deserve to win. >>> >>>it was lucky too as should have lost against Shredder and this one, but good >>>players are always lucky so... >>> >>>congratulations again! >>> >>>Sandro >> >>I agree, good and lucky. > >Last times I looked at the rules of chess there was no luck involved (Maybe you >are talking about the pairing). It is not Rybka fault if two opponents blundered in a winning position, but I would call this luck...do you have a better word? The games are there to be seen... This needs to be said, but I said also that it deserved to win as played the best chess by making less mistakes than the opponents. This is just a realistic analysis and I am not saying that the win was due to only luck...there is much difference! > >If rybka won a game it's because it is strong or its opponent is weak. Yes, we all know that actually Rybka is the strongest program and this came out from this tournament too. I would add also that with J.Noomen book and a better hardware, plus improved further it is for sure the favorite in Turin...unless someone improves much more...we will see. > >MP Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.