Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:43:25 12/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2005 at 00:02:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 22:13:47, Chessfun wrote: > >>On December 29, 2005 at 22:01:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On December 29, 2005 at 11:33:50, Ted Summers wrote: >>> >>>>Well in that case I will give the odds to Rybka. Even if you never know, that >>>>upset factor can be a pain in the butt. >>> >>>I apologize, >>> Gandalf is 0.5 points ahead on Rybka and it has WHITE against Fruit, an >>> advantage for GANDALF. >>> Rybka has BLACK, which in chess is a huge disadvantage. >>> >>>The statistical odds for gandalf to be at least a divided tournament winner or >>>undivided tournament winner is far bigger than the statistical odds Rybka wins >>>undivided the tournament. >>> >>>So you should redo your math a bit. >>> >>>Vincent >> >>I think maybe you should re-check your figures and redo your math. >> >>Rybka is in 1st 1/2 a point ahead. >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?475027 >> >>http://wwwcs.uni-paderborn.de/~IPCCC/ has the wrong table I believe a round >>behind. >> >>Sarah. > >It seems i made mistake, apologies! > >One should never trust university guys. Don't get paid to get jobs done. I can certainly agree with that, with respect to the "university guys" that had you in classes. They failed miserably. Such statements make you look _really_ bad...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.