Author: Ingo Althofer
Date: 12:11:31 12/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2005 at 13:56:53, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On December 30, 2005 at 13:02:43, Ingo Althofer wrote: >>Some 12 years ago I had a technical article on this >>("On telescoping linear evaluation functions") in the >>ICCA Journal (now ICGA Jornal), Vol 16 (June 1993), >>pp. 91-94, describing a theorem (of existence) which says >>that in case of linear evaluation functions with lots >>of terms there is always a small subset of the terms >>such that this set with the right parameters is >>almost as good as the full evaluation function. > >No insult intended, but much before your article William of Occam said "Numquam >ponendo est pluritas sine necessitate", or, in plain English "one should not >increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain >anything", which is, in cybernetics, dubbed as the principle of parsimony. Right. But Occams argument is a philosophical axiom, whereas the telescoping result is a theorem with strict mathematical proof (within the framework of reel linear algebra). >Fruit is in all probability based on that principle, but never forget that >simplicity does not necessarily mean lack of intelligence in a program; on the >contrary developing the model will become much easier, and there is less chance >of introducing inconsistencies, ambiguities and redundancies. Right. And for good reason engineers have the sentence: Technics in perfection is inconspicuous. (Translated from German, where it goes "Technik in Vollendung ist unscheinbar.") Ingo.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.