Author: Pedro Gomes
Date: 01:38:45 12/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2005 at 01:46:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On December 30, 2005 at 20:29:44, Uri Blass wrote: > >[...] >>A more interesting question is why the opponents resigned against rybka and did >>not continue until mate because it is known that rybka has a bug that may cause >>it problems to win won positions because it does not care about distance to >>mate. >[...] >>Uri > > Hi Uri > I like something with the name "fairplay". > Best regards > Kurt The objective of the game of chess is to mate an opponent´s king, so: why do many people think it is not "fairplay" to mate our opponent, or to see him mating our king ? Just Pedro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.