Author: George Sobala
Date: 02:07:14 12/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2005 at 04:48:16, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 31, 2005 at 00:39:33, George Sobala wrote: > >>On December 31, 2005 at 00:29:16, Majd Al-Ansari wrote: >> >>>Hiarcs 10 is a great program and I would put it on par with the top 5. The >>>thing is that right now Rybka is way stronger than anything out there. >> >>Well - if you put the GHz crush on Rybka (e.g. putting it up against Quad >>Shredder) it feels the pain! > >It is exactly what happened in the last tournament but rybka won the tournament. > >Maybe quad shredder is enough to compete with rybka32 bit but I doubt if it is >enough to compete with rybka64 bits. > >Shredder 2 cpu seems to be weaker than Rybka 32 bit > >see >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ratingall.html > >There is no big difference between the speed advantage from 32 bit to 64 bit and >the speed advantage from 2 cpu shredder to 4 cpu shredder and note also that >slightly positional personality of rybka is probably another improvement. > >I guess that rybka 64 bit slightly positional is better than quad shredder of >the commercial version(note that I say nothing about non commercial version that >may be better) > >Uri I'm not convinced and am happy to play my Deep Shredder Apple Quad against 64bit Rybka in a series of matches on ICC. Currently playing v Rybka 64 bit on an Opteron 2.85GHz at 120+0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.