Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 07:03:42 12/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2005 at 09:59:28, Majd Al-Ansari wrote: >I have noticed a slight decrease in results also, but I would not attribute it >to a weaker engine. I think it has more to do with time management. The newer >version of Rybka seems to be playing moves much quicker and always has way more >time than its opponent. I could be mistaken, but that is what I feel has >happened. This will only be noticeable in short time controls. If I remember right you can set a time control parameter. Perhaps you can select slow and see if that makes a difference. Torstein > > > >On December 31, 2005 at 09:48:13, James T. Walker wrote: > >>I have been testing the three versions vs only 3 programs at blitz. Here are >>the results so far. First two version have played the same opponents exactly >>the same number of games. Beta7 is catching up but so far..... >> >>1 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit 2392 334 >>2 Rybka 1.01 Preview 2 32-bit 2377 334 >>3 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit 2352 150 >>4 Fritz 8 2341 232 >>5 Fruit 2.2.1 2332 276 >>6 Toga II 1.1 2306 310 >>The downward trend of Rybka is disturbing even though the number of games is >>small.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.