Author: Zappa
Date: 21:44:21 12/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2005 at 20:27:35, enrico carrisco wrote: >On December 30, 2005 at 20:42:16, Zappa wrote: > >>On December 30, 2005 at 20:29:18, Roger D Davis wrote: >> >>>I haven't made an official tally, but it seems that in every report I >>>see...Rybka mutiliates the latest Hiarcs, even more than other engines at the >>>same level as Hiarcs. >>> >>>Yet, Hiarcs wasn't available to be tuned against...the latest version hadn't >>>been released yet... >>> >>>How can Rybka be so effective against an engine it was never tuned against? >>> >>>Roger >> >>You know Carrisco is going to flame you now :) >> >>anthony > >I realize you are probably joking, Anthony, but if you feel there is even an >ounce of truth to that, please post a link to a CCC message where I "flamed" >someone over pointing out (perhaps with an obviously frustrated state of >emotion) that their hasty judgments were without factual basis or statistically >relevant results. > >(Hopefully our definitions of FLAME do not differ...) > >-elc. Most probably they do differ. I just meant that it was likely he was going to get some long-winded post filled with frustrated comments about the lack of factual basis or statistical signifigance of his opinion :) Note that I don't consider flaming to be a bad thing; rather I'm something of a connoissuer. I appreciate a good flame, like a fine wine or a beautiful painting. For example, Bob, Vincent, and A. Steen are great flamers, while Sherry Windsor lacked wit and humor and was simply dull. With practice, perhaps you too could join the elite ranks of those flamers . . . . :) anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.