Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:57:06 01/01/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2006 at 05:17:34, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On December 31, 2005 at 16:28:52, Zappa wrote: > >>To paraphrase Stuart's post, "Rybka beats HIARCS because it is better". Looks >>like you are one of those people that is impressed by long sentences, no matter >>how inane the actual content . . . >> >>anthony > >Why inane ? Probably the Stuart's sentence was a bit ironic but it reflects >quite good the actual situation...if you don't agree feeel free to express your >opinion without personal attacks, or are just a bit envy of personal success of >Vasik ? I can also add that in my personal opinion to use a lot of hardware >power like Zappa in Paderborn is not sufficient to win. > >w.b.r. >Otello Of course using a lot of hardware is not enough. You need the hardware to work and this is the hardest part. If you solve the last problem and you have a program that is as strong as zappa then you have good chances to win but you have also good chances not to solve the last problem as happened to zappa based on anthony's reports. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.