Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 08:33:41 01/01/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2006 at 06:57:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 01, 2006 at 05:17:34, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On December 31, 2005 at 16:28:52, Zappa wrote: >> >>>To paraphrase Stuart's post, "Rybka beats HIARCS because it is better". Looks >>>like you are one of those people that is impressed by long sentences, no matter >>>how inane the actual content . . . >>> >>>anthony >> >>Why inane ? Probably the Stuart's sentence was a bit ironic but it reflects >>quite good the actual situation...if you don't agree feeel free to express your >>opinion without personal attacks, or are just a bit envy of personal success of >>Vasik ? I can also add that in my personal opinion to use a lot of hardware >>power like Zappa in Paderborn is not sufficient to win. >> >>w.b.r. >>Otello > >Of course using a lot of hardware is not enough. >You need the hardware to work and this is the hardest part. > >If you solve the last problem and you have a program that is as strong as zappa >then you have good chances to win but you have also good chances not to solve >the last problem as happened to zappa based on anthony's reports. > >Uri I agree that may have been some problem with Zappa hardware...but Rybka also prevail on single CPU against engines running on quads ... so the hardware power has a relative importance i.m.h.o. w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.