Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 05:10:00 03/31/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 30, 1999 at 13:04:07, John Merlino wrote: >On March 30, 1999 at 11:39:50, Tim Mirabile wrote: > >>On March 30, 1999 at 10:15:20, Tony Hedlund wrote: >> >>>On March 29, 1999 at 11:22:52, Tim Mirabile wrote: >>> >>>>On March 29, 1999 at 10:30:26, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>>> >>>>>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers >>>>>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>>>>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>>>>> 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363 >>>>>> 1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457 >>>> >>>>Just curious - why was CM6000 given "top billing" over Fritz, when its rating is >>>>equal, it's played fewer games, and vs weaker opposition? >>> >>>Please, weaker opposition has nothing to with it, look at the won percentage. >>>It has to do with decimals. >> >>Not what I meant - consider the different psychological impact if the list read: >> >> THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-03-28 65604 games played by 190 computers >> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2576 29 -28 627 66% 2457 >> 1 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2576 88 -71 100 78% 2363 > >Two possible tie-breakers: > >1. Alphabetical >2. Winning percentage > >jm There's no tie. CM6000 is first when counting decimals. Tony
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.