Author: Stefan Schiffermüller
Date: 07:35:19 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 07:55:53, stuart taylor wrote: >Fritz too. > >That, IF there will bwe any talking option, during game, that it should be done >with great style, and even though more than one option of talk style, might be a >very good option, but >a major option, being the main option, should be > >An intelligent commentary on the game! > >As intelligent and relevant as possible, but I certainly do not expect >perfection. But the very idea of it can help some people to think, when playing >informally. > >It should also be that after a comment which took a few seconds to come up, a >later comment can be made with even more knowledge, perhaps after another minute >of thinking time. > >Thanks and hopes > >S.Taylor I think a talking option or an option for an 'intelligent' commentary is more fun then serious. You can never expect an intelligent informally commentary by a computer. Not in the next 100 years!! You can never replace a commantary of an strong human player with a computer!! Therfore such an option would be funny but not serious. Look at the 'intelligent' Fritz commentaries ! Realistic is that you can have more insight in the evalluation function. You will not only have one number for the whole evaluation to watch but more numbers: king safety, pawn structure ... So the analysing of the game should be easier. Stefan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.