Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 08:00:26 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 10:27:27, Günther Simon wrote:
>On January 02, 2006 at 10:01:23, phili_ppe wrote:
>
>>On January 02, 2006 at 02:32:23, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Aloisio
>>>I have not idea but do not understand why
>>>you should want to use Polyglot/Winboard.
>>>Try the fine and free Arena-GUI available at
>>>http://www.playwitharena.com/ which is the
>>>best GUI for UCI-/Winboard engines in my
>>>opinion.
>>>Best regards
>>>Kurt
>>
>>Hello
>>I use Polyglot for UCI engines for Toga & Rybka but I have noticed the nodes per
>>seconds and the search depth decrease dramaticly with a UCI2WB adaptator.
>>Engine -> Polyglot -> Winboard -> Polyglot ->engine
>>All these ways weaken too much the uci engine.
>
>That's wrong. You probably just mean the _display_ in WB which _seems_
>to be decreased (because of a lot of output from UCI engines for the
>first 4 plies). If you look into the debug files you will see that
>your assumption was wrong.
>
>Guenther
Hi Guenther
I have never used Polyglot and am sure you know
things very well. The main question remains: why
should anybody use an an adapter for a UCI engine
instead of avoiding this by working with Arena GUI?
Best regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.