Author: Günther Simon
Date: 08:07:34 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 11:00:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 10:27:27, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On January 02, 2006 at 10:01:23, phili_ppe wrote: >> >>>On January 02, 2006 at 02:32:23, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Aloisio >>>>I have not idea but do not understand why >>>>you should want to use Polyglot/Winboard. >>>>Try the fine and free Arena-GUI available at >>>>http://www.playwitharena.com/ which is the >>>>best GUI for UCI-/Winboard engines in my >>>>opinion. >>>>Best regards >>>>Kurt >>> >>>Hello >>>I use Polyglot for UCI engines for Toga & Rybka but I have noticed the nodes per >>>seconds and the search depth decrease dramaticly with a UCI2WB adaptator. >>>Engine -> Polyglot -> Winboard -> Polyglot ->engine >>>All these ways weaken too much the uci engine. >> >>That's wrong. You probably just mean the _display_ in WB which _seems_ >>to be decreased (because of a lot of output from UCI engines for the >>first 4 plies). If you look into the debug files you will see that >>your assumption was wrong. >> >>Guenther > > Hi Guenther > I have never used Polyglot and am sure you know > things very well. The main question remains: why > should anybody use an an adapter for a UCI engine > instead of avoiding this by working with Arena GUI? > Best regards > Kurt ...because WB is by far the stablest and most reliable GUI, which also uses the least ressources and has the best additional tools :) Best regards, Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.