Author: David Dahlem
Date: 08:26:01 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 11:07:34, Günther Simon wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 11:00:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On January 02, 2006 at 10:27:27, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>On January 02, 2006 at 10:01:23, phili_ppe wrote: >>> >>>>On January 02, 2006 at 02:32:23, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi Aloisio >>>>>I have not idea but do not understand why >>>>>you should want to use Polyglot/Winboard. >>>>>Try the fine and free Arena-GUI available at >>>>>http://www.playwitharena.com/ which is the >>>>>best GUI for UCI-/Winboard engines in my >>>>>opinion. >>>>>Best regards >>>>>Kurt >>>> >>>>Hello >>>>I use Polyglot for UCI engines for Toga & Rybka but I have noticed the nodes per >>>>seconds and the search depth decrease dramaticly with a UCI2WB adaptator. >>>>Engine -> Polyglot -> Winboard -> Polyglot ->engine >>>>All these ways weaken too much the uci engine. >>> >>>That's wrong. You probably just mean the _display_ in WB which _seems_ >>>to be decreased (because of a lot of output from UCI engines for the >>>first 4 plies). If you look into the debug files you will see that >>>your assumption was wrong. >>> >>>Guenther >> >> Hi Guenther >> I have never used Polyglot and am sure you know >> things very well. The main question remains: why >> should anybody use an an adapter for a UCI engine >> instead of avoiding this by working with Arena GUI? >> Best regards >> Kurt > > >...because WB is by far the stablest and most reliable GUI, >which also uses the least ressources and has the best additional tools :) > >Best regards, >Guenther Well, WB is not reliable for UCI engines, in fact, needs an adapter simply to run UCI engines. :-) Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.