Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 09:56:44 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 11:53:20, stuart taylor wrote: >In which it clearly seems analytically provable that Spaasky's play was >faultless, yet extremely hard to see as being so, and is also very deep and >unclear....except after great and deep analysis. > >But as usual, I'm not organised enough to post the position again, although I >did atleast once before. > >Questions are >1)How long does it take for Rybka to find .....rh1? >2)And how long does it take to find .....h4? AMD 32 bits @ 2.1 ghz B Larsen - B V Spassky 2kr3r/ppp1qpp1/2p5/2b2b1p/2P1pPn1/1P2P1PP/PBQPB3/RN2K2R b KQ - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 10: 12...Cf6 13.Cc3 Rb8 14.0-0-0 µ (-1.25) Profondeur: 8/21 00:00:00 82kN 12...Cf6 13.Rf2 De6 14.Fxf6 Dxf6 15.Cc3 Dg6 µ (-1.25) Profondeur: 8/21 00:00:00 110kN 12...Cf6 13.a3 De6 14.b4 Fe7 15.Fd4 Fxh3 16.Fxa7 µ (-1.18) Profondeur: 9/26 00:00:01 228kN 12...Cf6 13.a3 a5 14.b4 axb4 15.axb4 Fxb4 16.Rf2 h4 17.g4 Fe6 18.Ta8+ µ (-1.15) Profondeur: 10/26 00:00:03 479kN 12...Cf6 13.Rf2 Rb8 14.a3 Dd7 15.Fxf6 gxf6 16.b4 Fe7 17.c5 µ (-1.13) Profondeur: 11/27 00:00:08 1279kN 12...Cf6 13.Rf2 Rb8 14.a3 Fd6 15.Fxf6 gxf6 16.b4 c5 17.d4 cxd4 18.c5 dxe3+ µ (-1.00) Profondeur: 12/34 00:00:22 3586kN 12...h4 µ (-1.01) Profondeur: 12/34 00:00:33 5220kN 12...h4 µ (-1.38) Profondeur: 12/34 00:00:41 6551kN 12...h4 13.Fxg4 Fxg4 14.hxg4 hxg3 15.Tg1 Th2 16.Fd4 Txd4 17.b4 Dh4 -+ (-1.41) Profondeur: 12/34 00:00:43 6903kN 12...h4 -+ (-1.66) Profondeur: 13/35 00:01:06 10603kN 12...h4 13.Fxg4 Fxg4 14.hxg4 hxg3 15.Tg1 Th2 16.Dc3 Dh4 17.Rd1 Th1 -+ (-1.71) Profondeur: 13/36 00:01:13 11883kN 12...h4 -+ (-1.96) Profondeur: 14/39 00:02:05 20066kN 12...h4 13.Fxg4 Fxg4 14.hxg4 hxg3 15.Tg1 Th2 16.Dc3 Dh4 17.Rd1 Th1 18.Txh1 Dxh1+ 19.Rc2 g2 20.Ca3 g1D 21.Txg1 -+ (-2.73) Profondeur: 14/40 00:03:12 31281kN >3)BUT, DOES it ever find the move before, which is .....h5? >4)Then, finally, DOES it ever find (before that)......Ng4? > >I'm sorry I didn't put up the moves again, but anyone who is familiar with it >will readily find the position I'm refering to. > >CY maybe you can ask Jack to put it up! > >For questions 3 and 4, I wouldn't consider it extreme to give Rybka 5 hours >each. But even if it finds answer to q.2 with answer tro q.1 in its analysis, >within only a few minutes, that would also be very good. >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.