Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 10:06:07 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 11:53:20, stuart taylor wrote: >In which it clearly seems analytically provable that Spaasky's play was >faultless, yet extremely hard to see as being so, and is also very deep and >unclear....except after great and deep analysis. > >But as usual, I'm not organised enough to post the position again, although I >did atleast once before. > >Questions are >1)How long does it take for Rybka to find .....rh1? >2)And how long does it take to find .....h4? >3)BUT, DOES it ever find the move before, which is .....h5? >4)Then, finally, DOES it ever find (before that)......Ng4? AMD 32 bits @ 2.1 ghz B Larsen - B V Spassky 2kr3r/ppp1qppp/2p2n2/2b2b2/2P1pP2/1P2P3/PBQPB1PP/RN2K2R b KQ f3 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 10: 10...Thg8 11.0-0 Rb8 12.Cc3 h5 13.Ca4 ³ (-0.62) Profondeur: 8/18 00:00:00 86kN 10...Cg4 ³ (-0.64) Profondeur: 8/18 00:00:00 88kN 10...Cg4 11.0-0 Dh4 12.Fxg4 Dxg4 13.Fa3 Fxa3 14.Cxa3 µ (-0.80) Profondeur: 8/19 00:00:00 101kN 10...h5 µ (-0.80) Profondeur: 8/21 00:00:00 145kN 10...h5 11.a3 Fg4 12.Fxf6 gxf6 13.Cc3 The8 14.b4 µ (-0.95) Profondeur: 8/21 00:00:01 169kN 10...h5 ³ (-0.70) Profondeur: 9/21 00:00:01 236kN 10...h5 11.a3 a5 12.b4 axb4 13.axb4 Fxb4 14.Ta8+ Rd7 15.Ta7 Tb8 16.0-0 ³ (-0.58) Profondeur: 9/23 00:00:02 334kN 10...Cg4 ³ (-0.59) Profondeur: 9/23 00:00:02 347kN 10...Cg4 11.g3 h5 12.0-0 Thg8 13.h3 Cf6 14.Fxf6 µ (-1.16) Profondeur: 9/24 00:00:02 443kN 10...Cg4 11.g3 Cf6 12.Fxf6 Dxf6 13.Cc3 Dg6 14.Rf2 The8 µ (-1.07) Profondeur: 10/24 00:00:04 688kN 10...Cg4 11.g3 Cf6 12.Cc3 Rb8 13.0-0-0 The8 14.Rb1 µ (-1.11) Profondeur: 11/28 00:00:08 1376kN 10...Cg4 11.g3 Cf6 12.Fxf6 Dxf6 13.Cc3 The8 14.0-0 Dd6 µ (-1.03) Profondeur: 12/32 00:00:18 3097kN 10...Cg4 11.g3 Cf6 12.a3 a5 13.Fxf6 Dxf6 14.Cc3 Dg6 15.Rf2 The8 µ (-1.00) Profondeur: 13/33 00:00:47 8028kN 10...Cg4 µ (-0.75) Profondeur: 14/36 00:01:49 18686kN 10...Cg4 11.g3 Cf6 12.a3 a5 13.Fc3 b6 14.Rf2 Cg4+ 15.Rg1 The8 16.b4 axb4 17.axb4 Fxb4 18.Fxg7 Rd7 µ (-0.73) Profondeur: 14/36 00:01:59 20219kN > >I'm sorry I didn't put up the moves again, but anyone who is familiar with it >will readily find the position I'm refering to. > >CY maybe you can ask Jack to put it up! > >For questions 3 and 4, I wouldn't consider it extreme to give Rybka 5 hours >each. But even if it finds answer to q.2 with answer tro q.1 in its analysis, >within only a few minutes, that would also be very good. >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.