Author: Harvey Williamson
Date: 10:07:47 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 12:22:09, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 08:15:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 02, 2006 at 07:55:55, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>On January 02, 2006 at 04:32:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>On January 02, 2006 at 03:17:05, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>22,5-27,5 ... (45 %) ... vs ... Fritz 9 >>>>>>21,0-29,0 ... (42 %) ... vs ... Toga II 1.1. >>>>>>16,0-34,0 ... (32 %) ... vs ... Rybka 1.0. Beta 32-bit >>>>>> >>>>>>Hiarcs 10 Test >>>>>>http://www.utzingerk.com/hiarcs10_test.htm >>>>>> >>>>>>Rating List >>>>>>http://www.utzingerk.com/rating_list.htm >>>>>> >>>>>>Best regards >>>>>>Kurt >>>>> >>>>>Thanks Kurt! >>>>> >>>>>I see here that the best "FREE" engine is better than Hiarcs 10. >>>>> >>>>>Interesting. >>>>> >>>>>Best , >>>>>Eduard. >>>> >>>>Yes - it is interesting :-) >>>> >>>>Hiarcs 10 beats F9, S9 and Toga on other test-sites. >>>>Only Rybka is a problem. >>> >>>Can You read? >>> >>>:-) >>> >>>Hiarcs 10 against: >>> >>>22,5-27,5 ... (45 %) ... vs ... Fritz 9 >>>21,0-29,0 ... (42 %) ... vs ... Toga II 1.1. >>>16,0-34,0 ... (32 %) ... vs ... Rybka 1.0. Beta 32-bit >>> >>>All Matches lost. >> >> >>Thorsten Czub wrote >>"Hiarcs 10 beats F9, S9 and Toga on *other* test-sites." > > >1. Thorsten Czub is a beta tester also no neutral tester in my eyes. Every beta >tester post the best results of his testing engine! :) > >2. I see no games by Thorsten. Thorsten did not post any games he just said there were 'other' independent test sites and Uri also pointed this out. I wonder who has the problem reading? :-) > >ED > > >> >>The meaning of the word other is that he is not talking about your games. >> >>looking at the CEGT results I see the following link and results >> >>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ratingall.html#12 >> >>Shredder 9 ( 2750 ) 62 + 17 = 25 - 20 47.6 % >>Fritz 9 ( 2776 ) 69 + 26 = 17 - 26 >>Toga II 1.1 ( 2767 ) 38 + 15 = 9 - 14 51.3 % 2775 >> >> >>It seems that the result of hiarcs against these programs in the CEGT is close >>to 50%. >> >>Note that results may be influenced by hardware or opening book. >> >>In blitz I find the following results in the following link that give hiarcs >>more than 50% against all of them. >> >> >>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitzall.html#11 >> >>9 Fritz 9 ( 2784 ) 101 + 34 = 37 - 30 52.0 % 2800 >>18 Shredder 9 ( 2745 ) 30 + 12 = 11 - 7 58.3 % 2809 >>12 Toga II 1.1a ( 2767 ) 31 + 14 = 9 - 8 59.7 % 2839 >> >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.