Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 12:37:38 01/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 15:32:07, Chessfun wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 13:52:55, Per Jørgensen wrote: > >>On January 02, 2006 at 13:43:10, Lex Loep wrote: >> >>>On January 02, 2006 at 13:32:36, yang sheng wrote: >>> >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?476182 >>>> >>>>Seems not very strong. >>>>Why the author only test it with old engines? >>>>I wonder Smarthink may be crushed by rybka, fritz9 or fruit. >>> >>>Some more results: >>> >>>SmarThink 1.00 r426 v Fritz 9 +5 -7 =8 >>>SmarThink 1.00 r426 v Shredder 9 +6 -5 =9 >>> >>>Games here: http://www.lokasoft.nl/smarthink_games >>> >>>Lex >> >>Thanks for the results. It's quite decent results. If SmarThink 1.00 can perform >>like Shredder 9 then it does deserve our attention. >> >>regards >>Per > >Since the above games were played by me just a brief note. Fritz 9 and Shredder >9 both used their own books and the games were run in a CB Gui, don't remember >which one. > >I also played 20 games v Fruit 2.2.1 and the score was +7 -7 =6 > >Sarah. Hi Sarah, after some changes the endgame testsuite is finally ready. 20 positions in epd and pgn with comments. Did you get these from this site? Else I would be happy to mail them. I think these positions deserve in-depth tests and analysies. /S
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.