Author: Harvey Williamson
Date: 03:34:00 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2006 at 03:58:57, Gabor Szots wrote: >Some comparisons using the Arasan5 and thhe WM-Test Express test suites. The >tested personalities: default, hyper-modern ON and that of Thorsten Czub (hyper, >aggressive, threat=5, combinationns ON, futility OFF). >The machine was P4 3GHz, hash was set to 73 MB (I don't know why, this was set >by default). >For Arasan5, 10 sec/position, for WM, 5 minutes prer position was used. > >Here are the results: > > Arasan5 (141 pos.) WM-Test-Express (30 pos.) > >default 106 18 > >hyper 108 not tested > >TC 102 14 > >Notes: >(1) Arasan5 is a tactical test suite. WM-Test express is a balanced test suite >consisting of king attack, positional play and endgame positions. >(2) The difference in WM-Test corresponds approximateli 37 Elo rating points >(using the EloStatTS program) >(3) Based on various test suites, hyper-modern alone seems to be somewhat >stronger tactically than the default setting. > >Gábor Hi, Thanks for these results. Is there any reason why you did not test hypermodern using the WM-Test? Your results of default v hypermodern in the Arasan5 test are very close. Best Wishes Harvey
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.