Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 04:18:10 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2006 at 06:34:00, Harvey Williamson wrote: >On January 03, 2006 at 03:58:57, Gabor Szots wrote: > >>Some comparisons using the Arasan5 and thhe WM-Test Express test suites. The >>tested personalities: default, hyper-modern ON and that of Thorsten Czub (hyper, >>aggressive, threat=5, combinationns ON, futility OFF). >>The machine was P4 3GHz, hash was set to 73 MB (I don't know why, this was set >>by default). >>For Arasan5, 10 sec/position, for WM, 5 minutes prer position was used. >> >>Here are the results: >> >> Arasan5 (141 pos.) WM-Test-Express (30 pos.) >> >>default 106 18 >> >>hyper 108 not tested >> >>TC 102 14 >> >>Notes: >>(1) Arasan5 is a tactical test suite. WM-Test express is a balanced test suite >>consisting of king attack, positional play and endgame positions. >>(2) The difference in WM-Test corresponds approximateli 37 Elo rating points >>(using the EloStatTS program) >>(3) Based on various test suites, hyper-modern alone seems to be somewhat >>stronger tactically than the default setting. >> >>Gábor > > >Hi, > >Thanks for these results. Is there any reason why you did not test hypermodern >using the WM-Test? Your results of default v hypermodern in the Arasan5 test are >very close. > >Best Wishes > >Harvey Hi Harvey, Here is the missing result: HIARCS 10 hypermodern solves 17 out of 30 in WM-Test-Express. Best wishes, Gábor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.