Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:54:59 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2006 at 10:35:19, Stefan Schiffermüller wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 07:55:53, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Fritz too. >> >>That, IF there will bwe any talking option, during game, that it should be done >>with great style, and even though more than one option of talk style, might be a >>very good option, but >>a major option, being the main option, should be >> >>An intelligent commentary on the game! >> >>As intelligent and relevant as possible, but I certainly do not expect >>perfection. But the very idea of it can help some people to think, when playing >>informally. >> >>It should also be that after a comment which took a few seconds to come up, a >>later comment can be made with even more knowledge, perhaps after another minute >>of thinking time. >> >>Thanks and hopes >> >>S.Taylor > >I think a talking option or an option for an 'intelligent' commentary is more >fun then serious. You can never expect an intelligent informally commentary by a >computer. Not in the next 100 years!! I think that you are clearly wrong. 100 years are a lot of time. Computers have the potential to do everything better than humans and it is only a question of time. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.