Author: Stefan Schiffermüller
Date: 08:12:12 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2006 at 09:54:59, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 10:35:19, Stefan Schiffermüller wrote: > >>On January 02, 2006 at 07:55:53, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>Fritz too. >>> >>>That, IF there will bwe any talking option, during game, that it should be done >>>with great style, and even though more than one option of talk style, might be a >>>very good option, but >>>a major option, being the main option, should be >>> >>>An intelligent commentary on the game! >>> >>>As intelligent and relevant as possible, but I certainly do not expect >>>perfection. But the very idea of it can help some people to think, when playing >>>informally. >>> >>>It should also be that after a comment which took a few seconds to come up, a >>>later comment can be made with even more knowledge, perhaps after another minute >>>of thinking time. >>> >>>Thanks and hopes >>> >>>S.Taylor >> >>I think a talking option or an option for an 'intelligent' commentary is more >>fun then serious. You can never expect an intelligent informally commentary by a >>computer. Not in the next 100 years!! > >I think that you are clearly wrong. >100 years are a lot of time. >Computers have the potential to do everything better than humans and it is only >a question of time. > >Uri Computers are good in calculation. Humans are good in thinking. If you say it is a question of time then it must be a very very long long time. 100 years are not enough. The advantages in the last decades on the field of artificial intelligence are nearly zero. Stefan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.