Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Thanks for extracting this!

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:32:23 01/03/06

Go up one level in this thread

On January 03, 2006 at 06:46:22, Uri Blass wrote:

>On January 03, 2006 at 06:30:51, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>On January 02, 2006 at 18:29:31, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>>On January 02, 2006 at 15:11:08, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>>In my eyes what rybka doing is very basic. Like fruit's eval + simple kingsafety
>>>>+ very little more than that, but real well tuned.
>>>>In my definition that is not much. That's real simple stuff.
>>>I don't think it is so simple...I strongly suspect that Rybka has a special
>>>evaluation fuction with a _lot_ of knowledge inside...the tuning isn't enough to
>>>explain that brilliant performances.
>>>I tend to agree with Uri.
>>Wouldn't you have thought the same thing about Fruit if you had never seen the
>I think that fruit also has a lot of knowledge inside of it relative to weaker
>Weaker programs may have bigger evaluation but bigger evaluation is not chess

As Christophe Theron has aptly pointed out (on several occasions), better search
also results in more knowledge.

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.