Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:28:58 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2006 at 13:32:02, Eelco de Groot wrote: >On January 03, 2006 at 11:58:44, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>On January 03, 2006 at 11:39:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>These numbers don't mean much. The difference within the pool does. >>They could call Fruit's rating - 852 - Fritz 9 - 819 etc... >> >>/S > > Hi Sune, not any new comment but...it still seems a large number! Not bad for a >program with "bad or missing King Safety" - sorry, just a quote from a thread I >came across on my harddisk- :) Even counting inflation of ratings, and the >inflation is mostly at the top of the list, counting that the results are >against computerprograms only and humans can still employ better anticomputer >strategies, well, it stil is a large number! If the SSDF should get faster >hardware one day and new programs, Fruit Rybka, Hiarcs and Smartthink are >tested, we are past 2900, approaching 3000 in no time! Maybe, finally GM >strength in some respects! > > > Best,Eelco The king safety of fruit is not bad. It was bad in fruit2.0 but it was fixed in fruit2.1 Of course it can be improved but the same is correct for other programs Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.