Author: Graham Banks
Date: 20:57:12 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2006 at 23:44:30, K. Burcham wrote: >On January 03, 2006 at 23:20:16, Graham Banks wrote: > >>I've emailed you to ask who the members are who are receiving favouritism. You >>could either discuss by email or post here so that people know who you're >>talking about. >>This isn't the first time you've made such a claim, >> >>Regards, Graham. > >The Computer-Chess Club is a free service that has been set up by a group of >individuals who became concerned with the persistent breaches of netiquette >occurring on the newsgroup, rec.games.chess.computer, namely a very high level >of off-topic posts > >Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess > >A panel of moderators has the power to erase specific messages that violate the >spirit of the charter of the Computer-Chess Club > >Again, read the charter, and treat everyone the same. If you are going to delete >something for one, do the same for another. > >I see the thread in question has been changed more than one time, someone is >mixed up and not sure what to do because they have not been properly trained and >do not understand how to use the charter as a guide. >This type of managing makes it difficult to take this place or its members >seriously. > >I will abide by the charter, but i am aware of the inconsistencies by >moderators. > >kburcham Who is receiving favouritism? To the best of my knowledge, the moderators are treating members equally. If it's fair to make the accusation, it's fair to enable a right of reply based on the accusation. Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.