Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 01:01:01 01/04/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2006 at 00:31:42, emerson tan wrote: >On January 03, 2006 at 23:54:47, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>Let's assume that you have tournments against the top humans and you have rybka, >>fruit 2.2., shredder, fritz9, and hiarcs 10 all running on a single processor >>computer (a good one) >> >>Let's further assume that the humans do not know they are playing computers and >>do not use an anticomputer style. >> >>Where would these five engines rate in the list of GMs? Would they be at the >>super gm level? Or would they barely beat master level players? >> >>best >>Joseph > >If an IM or even a master knows its a computer, then will just play to draw and >the machine's rating will be pulled down. there are a lot of IM and masters who >can force a draw But if the super GM cannot win, then the computer is at his/her level. Imagine 1000000 games between super GMs and computers with every game a draw. The super GMs and the computers have the same rating. So the question is, can the super GMs, even with 1000 practice games, beat the programs consistently (or in some manner get the lion's share of the points). If not, then the computers have reached even that level.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.