Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:37:37 01/04/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2006 at 04:49:03, emerson tan wrote: >On January 04, 2006 at 00:51:15, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>I wonder how good the engines will need to be before the anticomputer sytles no >>longer work.? >> >>I presume that if a master used an anticomputer style against a human GM, he/she >>would get killed? >> >>best >>Joseph > >Since one of the anti computer chess strategy is to do nothing but do it well, >programs should be able to plan to defeat anticomputer styles since tactics >cannot solve those horizon effect, only planning > >That's the reason why anti computer style against human GM will not work because >a GM knows how to devise a plan to break the anti computer style I am not sure about the claim that anti computer style will not work against human GM's. Do you have a proof that 2300 players cannot perform better against GM's by using anti-computer style. Did masters try that style against GM's in order to get a draw and found that it was not productive?(they do not have to draw every game and only performing better relative to not using anti-computer style is enough). Note that weak players who use anti-computer style cannot play GM's often when they can play computers often. Another point is that the strategy of GM's can be different based on the level of the opponent. Of course it is possible to do it also with programs but most programmers are not interested in beating weak players so they do not try to do something about it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.