Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are the top 5 programs at super GM level?

Author: David Shanholtzer

Date: 05:08:08 01/04/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 04, 2006 at 00:19:05, Dann Corbit wrote:

>>Let's assume that you have tournments against the top humans and you have rybka,
>>fruit 2.2.1, shredder, fritz9, and hiarcs 10 all running on a single processor
>>computer (a good one)

Can we toss in Toga II v 1.1a?

>>
>>Let's further assume that the humans do not know they are playing computers and
>>do not use an anticomputer style.
>>
>>Where would these five engines rate in the list of GMs? Would they be at the
>>super gm level? Or would they barely beat master level players?
>
>Definitely, without doubt, super-GM at blitz.
>It's wild extrapolation, but probably super-GM at 40/2.
>It's even wilder extrapolation, but probably IM or GM even at correspondence.
>
>We really don't have a lot of data.  Maybe the GM's would learn strategies
>against them (but if that is the case, then why don't they similarly learn
>strategies against each other).

They do. That is why GM's, IM's, and others etc. for that matter, prepare for
individual opponents prior to matches and tournaments. This is also where TNs
come in. Players at this level spend a lot of time studying and working.

(snipped)

Much is written about the horizon effect for computers implying perhaps
inadvertently that humans do not have such a limitation. But when it comes to
concrete calculation, even the best of the best also have "horizon" limitations.
This is not to say that a reasonably proficient player won't recognize some
patterns which indicate a given result at some indefinite time in the future
which computer programs may have some difficulty doing in many cases. On the
other hand, these programs may and do at times find unanticipated resources that
have been overlooked.

Much has also been written about the probable results if the programs were not
given access to their opening books when playing agianst humans. But how equal
is the contest when it is not so easy to make a human forget his "books" when
playing?

Just my 1.73 worth. :)








This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.