Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 12:17:59 01/04/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2006 at 15:04:29, Graham Banks wrote: >On January 04, 2006 at 14:52:01, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On January 04, 2006 at 14:21:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 04, 2006 at 02:44:14, John J. J. Smith wrote: >>> >>>>On January 03, 2006 at 15:34:35, Murat wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>This forum has been the most popular place for me on internet for a long time. >>>>>And frankly I have left the Computer Chess part of it mostly behind but I highly >>>>>value the Club part. I like to read all the messages and reply when I feel like >>>>>I can contribute. >>>>> >>>>>I also joke around with friends on various subjects. This is why I feel like at >>>>>home here. >>>>> >>>>>However the latest tread deleting over a harmless joking around between friends >>>>>left a bitter taste in my mouth. >>>>> >>>>>I can not talk for Steve but I myself disappointed, not to the moderators but >>>>>the fact that there are members here who needed to complain about it. >>>>> >>>>>I hope that Steve will come back and keep posting about Dedicated Computers as >>>>>well as other fun subjects. >>>>> >>>>>Let us not forget, the dedicated chess computers are still at the front lines of >>>>>our beloved chess game. I don’t think a child’s interest in chess will arise >>>>>from the latest and greatest 2700+ elo program on a 3.0 GHz machine but from the >>>>>40 dollar dedicated unit his mommy had bought him/her from the local toy store. >>>>> >>>>>In my opinion the members who complained about the posts are doing great >>>>>disservice to chess in general and to this forum in particular. >>>>> >>>>>Thank you for listening >>>>> >>>>>Murat :. >>>> >>>>I agree with Murat. We should all lighten up on this. Last year I had a post >>>>deleted, presumably after a complaint from a certain member. It was, IMHO, a >>>>humorous post that welcomed back Bob Hyatt after an absence. I was skocked to >>>>find it deleted because it was apprently "offensive". I still don't know what >>>>was wrong with it, apart from a dig at lawyers! >>>> >>>>Perhaps the moderator who deleted it may wish to comment on it? >>>> >>>>I support Steve and Ferd in their funny, but off-topic, posts here. If I get >>>>tired of the banter, I just stop reading the posts. Isn't this a simple >>>>solution? >>>> >>>>John >>> >>> >>>A couple of points. >>> >>>1. I remember the post you referenced above. Didn't offend me in the least >>>bit. But I could certainly see how one could think it might be offensive, since >>>there are lots of ways to interpret humor/sarcasm/irony/etc... >>> >>>2. We really don't delete off-topic posts unless (a) they build up to a >>>significant volume and (b) they produce multiple complaints. If you want to >>>write a post about a one-armed wallpaper hanger, I doubt it will go away. If it >>>blossoms into a long discussion about one-armed wallpaper hangers, it might well >>>get deleted of course, because it will produce complaints... >>> >>>When we get a complaint, _someone_ is going to end up upset. Either we delete >>>the post and the author gets upset, or we leave it up and the complainer gets >>>upset. It's not an easy decision... >> >> >>I have a little point for that topic. It were good if you had a tool to detect >>fake accounts just like Murat or JJ Smith. If you did you could see that this >>all is a hoax to belittle this forum as such. If all people had true identities >>you would be surprised to see how completely unknown figures would remain silent >>and who would certainly NOT complain about stuff they have no idea about. If >>someone like Corbit or you came with a certain complaint I would carefully >>examine the case if I were mod. All that is trivial. Bob, you must face the >>truth that a single looner can explode in atomic particles of various identities >>but all fakes. I know of people who own 7 (!) computers on their own. Let's see >>that makes 122789 personalities if you seperate women from men... :) > > >Hi Rolf, > >as I've previously mentioned, the CCC and CTF mods are pushing strongly for >changes that would help control this problem. >The website administrator has indicated that he will be investigating possible >changes soon. >You've hit the nail on the head. There are many fakes and multiple accounts. >Humans can be very strange! > >Regards, Graham. Sorry but this time the honors are going to your address because you had the message first. Of course it all depends on the tech that can prevent fakes. Here I'm ignorant like a little baby.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.