Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Off Topic Posts (Off Topic Post)

Author: Dan Honeycutt

Date: 12:55:40 01/04/06


While recent events prompt this post, my comments are intended to be general and
not directed at any specific moderator decision.

How should the moderators deal with off-topic posts?

One solution:  Off topic posts are not allowed by the charter and will not be
permitted.  Period.

IMHO, a bad solution.  CCC would become a stale and lifeless place.  Plus, too
much work for the moderators for what they get paid.

Another solution:  Off topic posts will be allowed unless someone complains, in
which case they are deleted.

IMHO, another bad solution.  Some stick-in-the-mud can spoil the fun for
everyone else.  Or, someone has a hard-on for a particular member and so always
complains if that member says anything off-topic.  Complaints in cases like this
should be rejected.  But, can a moderator reject a complaint about a post that
is clearly forbidden by the charter?  I think so.

Since I've been a member of CCC, three sorts of off-topic posts have usually
been allowed - (1) those intended to be humor, (2) those related to computers in
general, and (3) those related to chess in general.  A fourth situation
occasionally arises where a member feels that other member(s) have the expertise
to help them with some problem that is completely unrelated to computer chess.

The sort of off-topic posts that have been allowed have set a historical
precedent.  The members have accepted this precedent, otherwise they wouldn't be
members.  Every member would probably like to see more of this or less of that,
but members come here because they mostly like what they find.  Moderators are
elected by the members, yes, to enforce the charter, but also to represent the
members - to make the forum the sort of place where the members like to come.

I know as a CTF moderator I've left posts that were over the line regarding the
charter because I felt the topic was worthy of discussion.  I've also deleted
posts that did not violate the charter in any way, but I felt they added no
value at all to the forum.  I view the charter as a guide, not an iron-clad
rule.  The final decision of the moderator should be based on what, in his
judgment, is best for the forum.

My opinion is that off-topic posts of the types listed above should be allowed
unless in the opinion of the moderators they have run too far afield or the
thread looks to be about to erupt in flames.

Just my 2 cents.

Best
Dan H.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.