Author: Werner Schuele
Date: 00:04:08 01/05/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2006 at 16:18:53, Sune Larsson wrote: >On January 04, 2006 at 15:55:46, Werner Schuele wrote: > >>Game Conditions >>Hiarcs 10 384 MB Ram >>Smarthink 384 MB Ram >>2-4-5 pieces tbs >>ponder on >>Chessbase GUI >>each position played with white and black >> >>AMD64-X2, 30'/60+30'/60+30' 0 >> >> >>1 SmarThink 1.00 r426x64 ½1½½½½½½½½10011½½101010½0½½101½1½½½0½10½ 21.0/40 >>2 Hiarcs 10 ½0½½½½½½½½01100½½010101½1½½010½0½½½1½01½ 19.0/40 >> >>I think, the 9 Nunn endings are too easy for the new engines on fast cpus >> >>Werner > > > Too easy? GM Nunn stated that no clear verdict has been given about these > endings. Have you read his comments about pos 1-9? > > Could you please post these games? It would be very interesting to see if > Hiarcs or SmarThink understands something about good knight vs bad bishop or > activity in rook ending. > > regards > sune Hi Sune, I would be very interested in some comments from you! Werner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.